Compact and bijou not he slums of tomorrow

It is silly to suggest a mandated minimum size will somehow increase the quality of housing; all it will do is reduce choice and increase cost. What is needed is a mix of different sizes and styles to suit different families and different stages in life.
Other things being equal, the cost of building a home is proportional to the floor area. If the floor area was set by legislation to 100 m2, this would double the price of the smallest home someone could buy. This would not result in everyone getting a home twice as big, just in many more people not being able to afford any home at all.
Labels: Architecture, Smart Apartment
1 Comments:
Japan is a good example: Lots of teeny (by Australian standards) apartments -- but some are quite fancy.
Small apartments don't **have** to be low-quality.
--GG
September 15, 2008 9:42 AM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link or bookmark with Digg, del.icio.us, Newsvine or News Feed
<< Home